If you’re involved in a criminal case, it’s important to know how fingerprints might come into play. As evidence, they can either link someone to the scene of a crime or help prove their innocence. Your defense attorney will examine how the fingerprints were collected and handled since mistakes there could affect their validity in court.
Table of Contents
How Fingerprints Are Used in Criminal Cases
Fingerprints are a pivotal piece of evidence in various types of criminal cases, often serving as a definitive link between a suspect and the crime.
Below are some of the common types of crimes where fingerprints may be used by the prosecution:
Violent Crimes
Fingerprints are often a critical piece of evidence in violent crime cases, such as assault or homicide. The reason they’re so valuable is that if someone touches a surface at a crime scene, they might leave behind their unique fingerprint patterns.
Investigators look for these prints on weapons, like guns or knives, and surfaces, such as doorknobs or counters – anywhere the perpetrator may have touched.
Property Crimes
Property crimes, including burglary and theft, frequently involve the collection of fingerprints from the scene. Criminals often leave behind their fingerprints on items they handle, such as windows, doors, or objects left behind, allowing law enforcement to determine who was at the scene.
Drug-Related Offenses
In drug-related crimes, fingerprints can be essential in linking individuals to illegal substances or paraphernalia. Law enforcement agencies collect fingerprints from drug packaging, scales, or other equipment found at the scene. This evidence can strengthen a case against suspects involved in drug distribution or production.
Sex Crimes
In sex offense cases, the use of fingerprint evidence can be an important factor in proving presence at a particular location. Forensic teams may look for fingerprints on items or surfaces that could establish direct physical contact, such as clothing, bedding, or other objects relevant to the case.
Understanding what cases utilize fingerprint evidence most often and how they’re used is essential for defendants.
The Reliability of Fingerprint Evidence
Fingerprint analysis has long been considered a reliable method for identifying individuals in criminal investigations. However, while most studies support its general validity, experts agree that this method should not serve as the sole basis for determining guilt without accounting for potential error rates.
Error Rates in Fingerprint Matching
Research has revealed concerning error rates associated with fingerprint matching. A study conducted on the FBI’s fingerprint analysis indicated that false-positive results, where an innocent individual’s fingerprint is erroneously matched to that of a suspect, occur in approximately one out of every 306 cases.
Investigations into a police crime lab in Florida reported even higher rates of false positives, occurring in one out of every 18 cases.
The Importance of Context For Juries
Given these error rates, it’s crucial that fingerprint evidence be supplemented with additional corroborating evidence in criminal cases. Jurors must be equipped with a solid understanding of the reliability of the analytical methods used, the qualifications of the fingerprint examiners involved, and the potential for inaccuracies.
Unfortunately, many attorneys fail to provide jurors with this context, which can ultimately lead to the wrongful conviction of innocent individuals.
How a Criminal Defense Lawyer Can Challenge Fingerprint Evidence
When facing criminal charges where fingerprint evidence plays a role, having an experienced defense lawyer can be crucial. Your lawyer has several strategies at their disposal to challenge the validity and integrity of fingerprint evidence.
Here are some ways they can do this:
Questioning Collection Methods
A thorough examination of how fingerprints were collected is an essential first step in challenging fingerprint evidence. When these methods are compromised, the validity of the evidence can be called into question. For instance, improper lifting techniques, such as using inadequate adhesive or inappropriate surfaces for print extraction, may lead to incomplete or distorted samples.
An experienced criminal defense lawyer will investigate whether law enforcement adhered to established protocols during the collection process.
Arguing Lawful Reasons for Print Presence
Fingerprints may be present at a crime scene for lawful reasons that do not implicate the defendant in any wrongdoing. For instance, an individual may have legitimate interactions with a location – such as being a delivery person, a maintenance worker, or a visitor – prior to the incident occurring.
This prior presence would naturally result in the individual’s fingerprints being found at the site, absent any criminal activity.
Additionally, if the area is publicly accessible, it’s feasible that numerous individuals have left their fingerprints, which could make it difficult to truly determine culpability. By establishing a credible, lawful reason for the presence of the fingerprints, the defense can effectively argue that the evidence does not conclusively connect the defendant to the crime in question.
Calling Expert Witnesses
In many cases, the involvement of independent forensic experts can significantly impact the assessment of fingerprint evidence. A criminal defense lawyer will often work with experts to provide testimony regarding the flaws in fingerprint analysis or to demonstrate how the evidence presented by the prosecution may be less reliable than it appears.
These experts can illuminate the potential limitations of fingerprint-matching technology and challenge the conclusions drawn by the prosecution’s witnesses, strengthening the defense’s argument.
By incorporating expert testimony, the defense can provide jurors with a comprehensive understanding of the issues surrounding fingerprint evidence. This encourages a more critical evaluation of the facts presented.
Attacking the Quality of the Prints
The quality of fingerprint evidence is crucial in determining its reliability in a legal context. Smudged or partial prints can significantly hinder the ability to obtain accurate matches, leading to potential misidentifications. These compromised prints may arise from various factors, such as surface contamination, environmental conditions, or the manner in which the prints were collected.
In situations where prints are distorted or incomplete, experts may struggle to establish a conclusive link between the defendant and the crime scene.
Contact a Louisville Criminal Defense Attorney For Help Fighting Your Charges
Defendants facing criminal charges – especially where fingerprints are involved – should speak with a defense lawyer as soon as possible. Contact Suhre & Associates, LLC at (502) 371-7000 today to schedule a free consultation with an experienced Louisville criminal defense lawyer.
